Tuesday, 21 April 2015

What I Learnt at Penguin

Sorry I’ve been absent for a while. I spent the last couple of weeks doing work experience at Penguin Books. And, although it kept me from writing my blog, it was a fantastic experience and I learnt a lot. So what better title for my return blog post than ‘What I Learnt at Penguin’.

During my work experience, my most frequent job was to read manuscripts and write reports on them. Some of these manuscripts had been sent in by agents hoping to get them published. Others were books that had already been published in the US and the agent was looking for a British publisher. And what I learnt from reading these manuscripts is that it seems as though you don’t need to be a good writer to get an agent, and you don’t need to be a good writer to get published in the US.

I read many finished manuscripts that had already been published elsewhere that were badly written, boring and broke every rule every creative writing teacher preaches. So this led me to the conclusion that a publisher will publish your book if they think they can market it, but not necessarily if it’s any good. I read one manuscript that has been published in the US set during the Afghanistan war. The book was awful. There was no suspense, the characters were unrealistic and inconsistent, the encounters and events of the book were painfully manufactured and unnatural. But, a publisher could market it. It’s based on a very topical subject. War books are popular. With the right book cover, the right quotes, the right comparisons, that book could sell.

This conclusion was supported by the conversations I heard around the office. At one point, two editors and an assistant were gathered around a desk talking about a new manuscript that had been sent to them. All three of them loved the book, couldn’t stop going on about how well it was written and how they couldn’t put it down. But they were considering turning it down because they didn’t know how they would market it.  

I’m not writing about this because I want you to bear it in mind when you write. The worst thing you could do as a writer, in my opinion, is conform to what a publisher wants. I just find it very interesting that the commercial publishing industry is so bloody commercial. I'm also not saying anything bad about Penguin here. I have no idea if those manuscripts I read will be published or turned down. All I know is they had been accepted by an agent, and some of them had been published in the US.

There is so much more I could say about what I learnt at Penguin – and so much I probably will say in subsequent blog posts – but I wouldn’t be able to fit it all in here. So for this week I will leave you with a fact that you may find comforting and you may find infuriating: crap books get published all the time whilst good books are in danger of being turned down.


Thanks for reading. 

3 comments:

  1. May I ask, why would you recommend that a writer should not 'conform to what a publisher wants'?

    Surely the end goal of any author would be to have their work published and ultimately read and enjoyed. If the publisher will only publish the work that meets their commercial criteria, then surely it would pay to try to meet this criteria so far as is possible. This would be ever more important where writing is one's vocation and getting published ensures that food is placed on the table.

    I am genuinely interested in your thoughts on this matter, as I fear that I am not looking deep enough into the world of creative writing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you're right. The end goal for most authors is to get published. However, I usually warn against conforming to what a publisher wants because I genuinely believe that an author should write what is important to them and what comes naturally to them. In my opinion, if you try to force yourself to write in a style that's not yours or to write about a topic that you think is popular, your writing won't be as good as when your writing really means something to you.

      Of course that's just my opinion. I don't condemn conforming to what a publisher wants. I just wanted to make it clear that it wasn't the aim of this blog post to recommend conformity in writing.

      Thank you for reading my blog and for your comment. It's certainly an interesting debate with two very valid sides.

      Delete
    2. I see what you mean now, I hadn't thought that the storyline itself might be stifled by a conscious effort to conform to a publisher's desires.

      Thank you for your response, I look forward to reading your upcoming musings.

      Delete